COVID-19 Update: Given the further Government restrictions and lock-down, all case meetings at our offices are temporarily suspended and will be held via telephone conference call.

kang and co solicitors logo header

Monday – Friday | 09:00 – 17:00

CALL US: 0345 222 9955

kang and co solicitors logo 2018

Here at Kang and Co, our team deal with all manner of motoring offences. This article will analyse the offence of Careless and Inconsiderate driving (Driving Without Due Care and Attention), the elements of the offence that the Prosecution need to prove, the various sentences which can be given upon conviction, as well as examples of such behaviour.

The Law for Careless and Inconsiderate Driving

The legal position in relation to careless and inconsiderate driving is set out under section 3 of the Road Traffic Act 1988. This section states:

“If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence.” 

Upon reading, it becomes clear that the above section provides for 2 offences driving without due care and attention (careless driving) and driving without reasonable consideration for other persons using a road or place (inconsiderate driving).

It follows, therefore, that a person who drives inconsiderately, can also be charged with careless driving, but the reverse does not follow as a person can drive carelessly without being inconsiderate to other road users (for example, there need not be any other road users present).

Examples of behaviour which may be charged

  • Driving through a red light (careless)
  • Merging from a side road into the path of another vehicle (careless & inconsiderate)
  • Undertaking (careless and inconsiderate)
  • Collisions with roadside furniture (careless)
  • Flashing lights to make another road user give way (inconsiderate)
  • Unnecessarily slow driving (inconsiderate)
  • Driving through a puddle, splashing pedestrians (inconsiderate)

Elements of the Offence

To supplement the above, the Road Safety Act 2006 amended the Road Traffic Act 1988 to include section 3ZA. This new section gives a meaning as to what the above offence actually means. It states:

(1) This section has effect for the purposes of section…3…

(2) A person is to be regarded as driving without due care and attention if (and only if) the way he drives falls below what would be expected of a competent and careful driver.

(3) In determining for the purposes of subsection (2) above what would be expected of a careful and competent driver in a particular case, regard shall be had not only to the circumstances of which he could be expected to be aware but also to any circumstances shown to have been within the knowledge of the accused.

(4) A person is to be regarded as driving without reasonable consideration for other persons only if those persons are inconvenienced by his driving.

A distinction to dangerous driving is made here. For the offence of dangerous driving, the standard of a person’s driving must fall “far below” what would be expected, whereas for this less serious offence the standard of driving is “below” what would be expected.

This is an objective test, meaning that the behaviour is compared to that of a reasonable person. The Prosecution must show, beyond reasonable doubt, that the Defendant’s driving fell below that of a competent and careful driver. This is, of course, based on the facts of the alleged offence.

How Can I Defend Against a Charge of Careless or Inconsiderate Driving?

Again, this is very much fact sensitive. In relation to a charge of careless driving, the Defendant must show that his driving was not careless in that his standard of driving did not fall below that of a competent and careful driver.

For example, if there is a collision between two vehicles and the Police believe that Driver A is at fault, a charge is brought against him. However, at trial, if, either through photographs, road plans or the cross-examination of Driver B, the Court is satisfied that Driver B was actually the one at fault for the collision, then Driver A is acquitted.

Another example is where there is a collision between Driver A and a wall. Driver A explains that the car acted oddly before the collision. Subsequently, it is found that a steering fault had caused the collision. Though expert evidence is usually likely in such cases, this scenario would be a defence to careless driving. However, such a defence would likely not succeed if the defect was already known to Driver A.

However, inexperience is not a defence. So, where a learner driver collides with another vehicle and the circumstances show he was at fault, he will be guilty of an offence.

In relation to inconsiderate driving, it would be for the Defendant to show that his driving did not, in fact, cause another driver to be inconvenienced. This would be down to the evidence given by the complainant, if doubt can be raised that any inconvenience was actually suffered, then the Court would acquit.

What is the Likely Sentence for Careless and Inconsiderate Driving?

If pleading guilty or being convicted after trial, there are a number of tiers within the sentencing guidelines for this offence and it will be based on the facts of the offence as to which tier the Court places the Defendant for sentence:

  • Category 1 – Higher Culpability AND Greater Harm
  • Category 2 – Higher Culpability AND Lesser Harm; OR Lower Culpability AND Greater Harm
  • Category 3 – Lower Culpability and Lesser Harm

In determining whether there is Higher Culpability, the Court will have regard to the following:

  • Excessive speed or aggressive driving
  • Carrying out other tasks while driving
  • Vehicle used for the carriage of heavy goods or for the carriage of passengers for reward
  • Tiredness or driving whilst unwell
  • Driving contrary to medical advice (including written advice from the drug manufacturer not to drive when taking any medicine)

In all other cases, there will be a finding of Lower Culpability.

In determining whether there is Greater Harm, the Court will have regard to the following:

  • Injury to others
  • Damage to other vehicles or property
  • High level of traffic or pedestrians in vicinity

In all other cases, there will be a finding of Lesser Harm.

An example would be a collision between two vehicles with evidence of the Defendant driving at high speed. In that case, there would be both Higher Culpability AND Greater Harm. This would see the Defendant into category 1 – the most serious category.

Another example would be a driver merging from a side road into the path of another vehicle requiring evasive manoeuvres. In that scenario, there is no excessive speed or evidence of tiredness, likewise, there is no damage or injury and no evidence of any high levels of traffic or pedestrians. In such a scenario, this would see the Defendant placed into category 3 as there would be Lower Culpability AND Lesser Harm.

Once the category of offence has been determined, then the following guidelines apply:

Level of Seriousness Starting Point Range Disqualification/Points
Category 1 Band C Fine Band C Fine Consider Disqualification OR 7-9 Points
Category 2 Band B Fine Band B Fine 5-6 Points
Category 3 Band A Fine Band A Fine 3-4 Points


The fine element of the sentence is the “punishment” and the disqualification or points is the ancillary order which must occur. Only the punishment can be reduced in terms of any credits for guilty plea.

If you find yourself facing a charge of Careless or Inconsiderate Driving, Kang & Co have specialist lawyers on hand to advise and represent you throughout the entire Court process.



Request A Callback or Email from a Kang & Co Solicitor

Do you require a solicitor? Please don't hesitate to get in touch with us. Use our quick contact form below and a member of our experienced and professional team of solicitors will contact you as soon as possible to discuss your requirements and your options.


Our Offices

Birmingham Head Office

1 Victoria Square
B1 1BD

London Office

5 Chancery Lane

Milton Keynes Office

100 Avebury Boulevard
Milton Keynes
Buckinghamshire, MK9 1FH

Accreditations, Partnerships and Press

Our Competitively Priced Agreed Fees for Motoring Offences start from £1,000 + VAT

Our Competitively Priced Fixed Fees for Criminal Offence cases start from £1,500 + VAT


An Excellent Service, Mr. Kang is a highly sought solicitor. Very knowledgeable about the subject to hand and extremely confident with the advice given to me at the time of a stressful situation.

I would recommend Kang and Co Solicitors above any other company I’ve spoken too.

Above all I got the outcome I desired based upon Mr. Kang expertise.​

Miss. P


Very clearly explained the process, took his time over getting a very clear and accurate history of events and mitigation. Barrister on the day was well prepared, went over key mitigation and presented it well in court, an excellent advocate. Barrister clearly explained possible outcomes and most realistic outcome.

Excellent service from initial contact to finishing the court case. Would recommend to anyone.

Robert Morris

Kang & Co Solicitors is a truly specialist high-end law firm providing legal advice and representation for all matters involving Criminal Law, Driving Offences, Transport Law, Pace Interviews, Regulatory Law and Licensing Law.

Our head office is located at 1 Victoria Square in Birmingham City Centre and we offer our services throughout England and Wales on a private fee-paying basis. We also have an office at 5 Chancery Lane in London and another office in central Milton Keynes. We are frequently instructed by individuals and businesses nationwide.

birmingham office lawyers

Birmingham Office

1 Victoria Square
West Midlands
B1 1BD

london office lawyers

London Office

5 Chancery Lane

100 avebury boulevard office

Milton Keynes Office

100 Avebury Boulevard
Milton Keynes
Buckinghamshire, MK9 1FH

Business Hours

Monday – Friday
09:00 – 17:00
Weekends/Bank Holidays

Meetings at our offices are by Appointment Only

close slider

kang and co solicitors logo 2018