kang and co solicitors logo header

Monday – Friday | 09:00 – 17:00

CALL US: 0330 818 9837

kang and co solicitors logo 2018

Brilliant Legal Representation

“I was recently represented by Kang & Co Solicitors for a drink driving charge. From the initial telephone call it was clear that Kang & Co were experts in this field. They provided sound advice and diligently guided me through the process leading up to the court case. Through their legal representation I was able to avoid a community order and receive the best possible outcome for my case .”

Ollie, TrustPilot

Flawless Legal Help

“They had very little time to go ahead with getting all valid documents needed for my case, they were extremely efficient and great at calming me and keeping me updated with my case and it’s details with interviews and courtrooms to appear in, overall great experience with kang and co, I came out with a 2 year suspended sentence instead of a 1 year custodial sentence for GBH without intent. I now get to spend the time caring for my nan and helping with my family’s needs.”

L. Roddis, TrustPilot

Kang & Co Solicitors is a truly specialist high-end law firm providing legal advice and representation for all matters involving Criminal Law and Driving Offences. We are ranked as a top tier law firm by The Legal 500 and Chambers and Partner’s prestigous law guides.

Our head office is located at 1 Victoria Square in Birmingham City Centre and we offer our services throughout England and Wales on a private fee-paying basis. We also have an office at 330 High Holborn in London and another office in central Milton Keynes. We are frequently instructed by individuals and businesses nationwide.

birmingham office lawyers

Birmingham Office

1 Victoria Square
West Midlands
B1 1BD

330 High Holborn Kang and Co Solicitors London

London Office

330 High Holborn

the pinnacle office

Milton Keynes Office

The Pinnacle
Midsummer Boulevard
Milton Keynes

Business Hours

Monday – Friday
09:00 – 17:00
Weekends/Bank Holidays

Meetings at our offices are by Appointment Only

Falsely Accused of Stalking in the UK

by | May 9, 2024 | Articles, Crime

In today’s digital age, accusations of stalking have become increasingly prevalent, often ensnaring individuals in a web of legal complexities and social stigma. For those falsely accused of stalking in the United Kingdom, the ordeal can be distressing and bewildering. In this article, we clarify the legal landscape surrounding false accusations of stalking, outline the processes individuals should undertake, and explain the legal defences available within UK law.

Understanding the Stalking Allegation

Stalking, as defined by the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, encompasses a pattern of behaviour that causes alarm, distress, or fear of violence in another individual. Such conduct may manifest in various forms, including persistent communication, surveillance, or unwanted attention, perpetrated either in person or through digital channels.

Initiating Legal Recourse

Upon being falsely accused of stalking, individuals should promptly seek legal counsel from experienced criminal defence solicitors specialising in harassment and stalking cases. Legal professionals possess the requisite expertise and case experience to navigate the intricate complexities of the legal system, therefore safeguarding the rights and interests of the accused throughout the adversarial process.

Potential Legal Defences for Stalking

In contesting allegations of stalking, several legal defences may be invoked to rebut the prosecution’s case and exonerate the accused. These defences may include:

Lack of Intent:

Demonstrating that the alleged conduct was unintentional and devoid of any malicious intent may serve as a potent defence against accusations of stalking. Establishing a lack of mens rea, or guilty mind, is instrumental in undermining the prosecution’s assertion of criminal culpability.

Lawful Purpose:

Establishing that the conduct was undertaken for a lawful purpose or within the parameters of legitimate employment responsibilities can potentially serve as a defence against allegations of stalking. Instances wherein the alleged conduct pertains to lawful surveillance activities conducted by law enforcement agencies or private investigators may fall within this scope.

Reasonable Belief in Consent:

Asserting that the accused harboured a genuine and reasonable belief in the consent of the purported victim to the impugned conduct can constitute a viable defence against accusations of stalking. However, the onus lies upon the accused to adduce cogent evidence substantiating the presence of such a belief.

Prevention / Detection of a Crime:

If it alleged conduct was pursued to either prevent a criminal offence from being committed or detect a criminal offence, this can amount to a defence at trial. If this defence is to be relied upon, a Defendant will need to provide evidence regarding the crime that was being planned/committed and why the relevant authorities such as the Police were not notified.

Reasonable Conduct:

If the conduct was reasonable based on the individual circumstances of the allegation, this can amount to a defence. Whether conduct is regarded as reasonable will be based on an objective standard of the alleged conduct therefore, a Defendant may form the view that their conduct was reasonable however, the Court may not share the same view. An experienced criminal defence lawyer should be able to provide an assessment on the likelihood of this defence being successful at trial.

Sentencing Guidelines for Stalking

In adjudicating cases of stalking, the Court adheres to sentencing guidelines outlined within the legal framework of the UK. The gravity of the offence, as well as the presence of aggravating or mitigating factors, significantly influences the sentencing outcomes, thereby delineating the contours of judicial discretion in imposing punitive measures.

Factors Influencing Sentencing

Severity of Harm:

The severity of harm inflicted upon the victim, encompassing emotional distress, psychological trauma, and physical harm, constitutes a pivotal determinant in sentencing deliberations. Instances wherein the victim suffered profound and enduring adverse effects due to the stalking behaviour may warrant more stringent punitive measures.

Duration and Persistence:

The duration and persistence of the stalking conduct, indicative of a sustained pattern of harassment and intimidation, are key considerations in sentencing determinations. Prolonged campaigns of stalking characterised by relentless pursuit and pervasive intrusion into the victim’s life may warrant heightened punitive sanctions.

Impact on Victim’s Well-being:

The impact of the stalking behaviour on the victim’s well-being, encompassing disruptions to personal and professional life, apprehension for personal safety, and erosion of psychological resilience, assumes paramount significance in sentencing assessments. Sentencing considerations may be informed by expert testimonies elucidating the adverse effects of stalking on the victim’s mental and emotional health.

Sentencing Guidelines for Stalking

In accordance with the legal provisions delineated in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, individuals convicted of stalking offences in the UK may be subject to custodial (prison) sentences, community orders, or ancillary measures aimed at rehabilitation and deterrence. The sentencing guidelines produced by the Sentencing Council provide a structured framework for judicial discretion, ensuring consistency and proportionality in sentencing outcomes throughout Courts across England & Wales.

Custodial Sentences (Prison):

In cases involving egregious instances of stalking characterised by sustained and malicious conduct resulting in significant trauma to the alleged victim, the imposition of custodial (prison) sentences may be deemed appropriate. The duration of incarceration is contingent upon the severity of the offence, with aggravating factors meriting enhanced custodial terms.

Community Orders:

In circumstances wherein the stalking behaviour does not warrant immediate custodial sanctions but necessitates intervention and supervision, the imposition of community orders may be considered. Community-based rehabilitative measures, such as participation in rehabilitation programs or adherence to restraining orders, serve as alternative sentencing options aimed at fostering accountability and facilitating behavioural modification.

Ancillary Measures:

In addition to custodial or community-based sanctions, ancillary measures such as restraining orders, non-molestation orders, and notification requirements may be imposed to afford protection to the victim and deter future instances of harassment. Breach of such orders constitutes a separate criminal offence, thereby augmenting the efficacy of deterrent measures.

Navigating Legal Proceedings

Throughout the course of legal proceedings, individuals falsely accused of stalking are entitled to a fair process, enshrined as fundamental principles within the framework of UK jurisprudence. Availing oneself of competent legal representation, exercising the right to silence, and adhering to judicial directives are indispensable measures conducive to safeguarding one’s legal interests and navigating the adversarial process with efficacy.


For individuals falsely accused of stalking in the UK, the ordeal can be emotionally taxing and legally daunting. By comprehensively understanding the legal framework governing allegations of stalking, initiating prompt legal recourse, and leveraging available defences, individuals can mitigate the repercussions of false accusations and safeguard their rights within the purview of UK law. Navigating the labyrinthine terrain of legal proceedings necessitates prudent guidance from experienced legal professionals adept at safeguarding the interests of the accused amidst the crucible of adversarial adjudication.

Do you require legal advice &/or representation?

If you are facing a criminal or driving offence prosecution and require expert legal representation at Court, call our lawyers on 0330 818 9843 or complete our Contact Form.

falsely accused of stalking uk, falsely accused of stalking, criminal law, UK law, criminal defence solicitors lawyers, legal article

First-Time Offence for Criminal Damage

First-Time Offence for Criminal Damage

A charge of criminal damage can significantly impact individuals, regardless of their prior involvement with the legal system. Whether through an act of vandalism or destruction of property, the ramifications of such charges can be profound. In this article, we will...

Our Testimonials

Feedback from our clients is helpful and appreciated at Kang & Co to help our team to continually improve our services.

Google Reviews
Review Solicitors
Yell Reviews

Our Offices

Birmingham Head Office

1 Victoria Square
B1 1BD

London Office

330 High Holborn

Milton Keynes Office

The Pinnacle
Midsummer Boulevard
Milton Keynes, MK9 1BP

Chambers and Partners 2024 Ranked Leading Law Firm
The Legal 500 Leading Firm Crime and Driving offences

Accreditations, Partnerships and Press

close slider